Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (193671)	7/8/2004 8:17:15 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 1575705

I don't remember Monica filing a sexual harassment suit. Refresh my memory please. How about I refresh your memory of what I posted. I'll bold the word you seemed to miss. "The law made his sexual behavior with other subordinates an issue, even consensual sexual behavior." The law? How about the right.......they put Paula Jones up to it. That's other as in someone else besides the person who filed the harassment suit. Of course, you mean the GOP again. If your post was supposed to be an argument that I don't have our countries best interest at heart is was a rather weak and incoherent one. That's only because you have a bias for Bush. Its unfortunate that you can't be objective enough to fairly evaluate the current president. Any bias I might have doesn't change the fact your post was totally ineffective as an argument that I don't have our countries best interest at heart. You are intitled to your opinion of course. Your argument seems to be something like A - Bush is a horrible, stupid and corrupt president who is leading this country to disaster, perhaps even ruin B - I am a strong and enthusiastic supporter of Bush Therefore C - I must not have the best interest of the country at heart. Yes, that would be the argument albeit somewhat exaggerated......a logical one at that. There are two main problems with that argument 1 - You fail to establish you premises. A is poorly supported and B is straight out false. I have established the A premise through innumerable posts on this thread. The B premise is best on the majority of your posts.......which have been much more for Bush than against. 2 - Even if your premises where true they would not logically lead to your conclusion. Your conclusion would be only one possibility not the only one. If Bush really was so horrible for the country and even personally didn't have the countries best interest in mind, then they could be mistaken about Bush rather then actually not wanting what is good for our country. But in any case your premises are not true. I am unclear what you understand logic to be but if someone supports a person who is damaging the country than their first priority has to be either the person or themselves rather than the country. ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next