Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (193904)	7/13/2004 6:56:27 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 1575657

Paula Jones never claimed sexual harassment until the GOP put her up to it. She even admitted that recently. Do you have a link to a news report about that? Even if its true "put her up to it" isn't the same as being told to make it up. She may have been convinced by conservatives to report what Bill did do her. Once again.......the GOP managed to turn an issue of adultery into sexual harassment. The law Clinton signed managed to turn an issue of adultery at work with a subordinate into information that was relevant in a sexual harassment case. I never said that you were "a strong and enthusiastic" supporter. See Message 20292283 You said "The B premise is best on the majority of your posts" The B premise was "B - I am a strong and enthusiastic supporter of Bush". you may not love Bush but he stands for GOP [not even conservative] values and you will support him to the death I would not support him if there was someone else who I thought was a better candidate who had a real chance of winning. My ideal candidate would be a relatively conservative libertarian or a relatively libertarian conservative. But the GOP doesn't put forth libertarian candidates. The libertarian party often puts out candidates that aren't very conservative, and besides they never have a chance of winning. The Dems usually put out big government candidates who want to increase taxes and regulation. Bush is the best realalistic option. Your feigned attempt at some kind of objectivity is just that.......feigned IMO No it isn't. Sure I have my opinions and philosophy, and in some cases those coincide with Bush's (while rarely being the same as Kerry's). But within those criteria of my ideas and philosophy I am as objective as you can reasonably ask anyone to be. I won't praise an idea just because Bush proposes it or oppose an idea just because it is endorsed by Kerry or opposed by Bush. Sorry but I've lost your point. The point is clear and obviously true but if you want to leave it I am not opposed to that. No need to go around in repetitive circles about it. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next