SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rocket Red who wrote (1930)6/18/2000 10:36:00 AM
From: the Chief  Read Replies (1) of 1996
 
Idcn was a 100% gain after I told people to buy it.They decide when they sell or hold I don't.

You see RR this is where your selective memory...the memory that appoints you a guru gets screwed up.

You say that you should be congratulated because you gave early ICDN holders a 100% gain. But where was your "sell signal" for those that bought at .06 when you kept pumping it?

So you stand on your 100% gain is very selective, why didn't you warn those that bought in at .065 and higher to bail when it was falling??

So if a 100% gain is a measurement of a guru, what is .15c to .80c on RKR...because I was telling people to give RKR a serious look at .15c...even by your standard that is a 400%+ return.

Yet you somehow hold me responsible for the demise of the stock from .80c downwards....and at the sametime don't hold yourself responsible for the fall of IDCN..??

You insist that "They decide when they sell or hold I don't.
So why did you decide to issue the sell on the RKR thread but not on the IDCN thread....is it because you didn't own RKR but did own IDCN and didn't want to jeopardize your investment, so allowed IDCN to fall in silence?? Your other face is shining through RR.

the Chief
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext