Commiserating With Colin Powell
By George Neumayr
George Neumayr is managing editor of The American Spectator.
Mike Wallace, wincing in pain, and looking heavenward with mock contempt, asked Bob Woodward about George Bush's conviction that he has a religious duty to "free people." What an absurd notion, registered Wallace's face.
<font size=4>
JFK-era liberals like Wallace normally knock Republican presidents for not helping people, for not "bearing every burden" of the world.
But Bush's humanitarianism isn't up to snuff for the self-
appointed humanitarians of the left. Wallace's cynical
heavenward glance suggests why: Bush's motivation for
freeing people isn't sufficiently secular. It grates on
them that duty to God -- rather than duty to the U.N. or
some humanist creed -- motivates Bush's humanitarianism.
One couldn't imagine Mike Wallace asking Bob Woodward
incredulously, why does Kofi Annan think he has a duty to
help free people from tyranny? But Wallace asked Woodward
that about Bush simply because Bush is religious and
religion and humanitarianism are an obvious contradiction
no enlightened person could entertain. Humanitarianism
must be left to liberal humanists who alone know how
to "free people."
Woodward played up the Bush and religion angle too, noting that Bush said to him that he sought guidance during his meditations on whether to go to war not from his earthly father, but from his eternal "father" in heaven. Apparently we are supposed to be troubled by this. But few people outside of Wallace's and Woodward's neighborhoods will be.
Judging from the interview, Woodward didn't come up with
much in his book, unless you consider it shocking that the
U.S. government pursues diplomacy and war planning
simultaneously and uses congressional funds to plan for
the event of war. Or that Bush didn't consider Colin
Powell worth consulting during crunch time. Woodward had
to fall back on faked-up melodrama to gin up interest in
his book, such as when he said Powell asked a question of
Bush in a "somewhat chilly way." Not only did Powell ask
Bush a question in a "somewhat chilly way," but at one
point he was "semi-despondent," according to Woodward.
Colin Powell, good. Dick Cheney, evil. That was the
unassailable assumption running through Wallace and
Woodward's bantering. Clearly Cheney was up to no good. He
was in a "fever" to get Hussein, Woodward heard from
Powell. Contrary to his image, Cheney apparently suffers
from a surfeit of passion. Powell, on the other hand, is
an oracle of wisdom, coolly applying a "Pottery Barn"
principle to Iraq that impressed Woodward with its
lucidity: you break it, you buy it. Wallace's
identification with Powell was so total that he seemed
aggrieved for Powell that he had been cut out of the war
planning. "Are you serious?" gasped Wallace after Woodward
said that Powell was told tardily about the decision to go
to war.
<font size=5>
It is good to know for future reference that liberals now
consider it imprudent and naive for presidents to help
foreigners suffering under tyrannies. Republican
presidents will have to remember that the next time the
left demands they intervene somewhere. Wallace, suddenly a
strict constructionist, even combed the Constitution for
Bush's duty to free the people of Iraq. Wallace couldn't
find it in there.
<font size=4>
The interview fit the liberal script pretty well. But Woodward let down the team at one point, noting Bush's shrewd skepticism about the CIA's Weapons of Mass Destruction evidence. Woodward seemed to go out of his way to say that George Tenet had blown it at key moments, assuring Bush that the existence of WMDs was "a slam dunk case" even as Bush wondered if the evidence was ironclad. When the CIA visited the White House and showed Bush satellite photography suggesting the existence of WMDs, Bush, according to Woodward, wasn't satisfied, telling the briefer in effect "nice try" but that he wanted a higher standard of proof.
Woodward's determination to embarrass Tenet on this point was curious. Did Tenet not cooperate with Woodward enough on the book?
<font size=5>
Woodward was so busy embarrassing Tenet that it appeared
for a moment Bush wasn't rushing to war. |
