Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM)

MDMN 0.000001000

-99.0%

Jun 3 1:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: scamedfred who wrote ()	4/10/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: Handshake™	of 25548

To Frank Paletta aka scamedfred: Frank, the SI website offers an opportunity for great minds to shares thoughts about investing, about life's bullshit, and a chance to gain great friendships. Should you have hardcore evidence that Medinah or NPEC is scamming its investors come forward with that information. Let the public forum be the place to disseminate it. It might save someone's hard earned dollars from being whisked away across some border. It might also open the door for you. It might provide you with an opportunity to invest in a company and actually make money. I know thats an interesting concept. As you can tell, I am resourceful and persistent. Thats the coonass in me. Should you need help with your investments, i.e. need to find out whether you're being scammed or not drop me an email, I'll be more than happy to do some DD for you and see what I can find out. Who knows it might even open the door for me. I'm always looking for an investment to wipe away my tax loss carry forwards...lol! :-) Handshake (Vince Castille) Handshake_international@msn.com To: nimbus (422 ) From: scamedfred Friday, Mar 20 1998 1:56PM ET Reply # of 440 Yesterday I made a few very negative post about this company. It is out of utter frustration. Ive been in this stock since the $1.15 range and bought all the way down. I really believed in the company I guess. As I thought about my 1st SI posts ever I started to think how stupid is that, the company Ive invested all my money in is the company I go on SI and rip. Just Stupid! My name is not "scamedfred" it's Frank Paletta. Since this company failed I have spoke to Rob Gillingham numerous times and I know for a fact he was trying his best to turn the shell into a successful company. Things take longer than expected all the time and I was really starting to get frustrated and when I could no longer speak to him I got more frustrated and started my posts. I started to act like Tom O'flynn that piece of shit who is also "john enwright" and "sae" the person who started the JVGI thread when he was a happy employee of Java but once fired he resulted in ripping the company down...I NEVER WANT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE SAME BREATH WITH HIM! HE IS SCUM! AND TO ACT LIKE HIM MAKES ME WONDER ABOUT MY OWN CHARACTER. But, I am not like him and I do not want to see this shell disappear so lets post positive posts or nothing at all because to shoot ourselves in our own foot is not very bright. Who knows maybe something is about to happen very soon and that is why everything is so quiet. Thats what Iam hoping for! I also would like to use this public forum to apologize to Rob Gillingham for all of a sudden losing my trust in him and disrespecting him on this forum. I hope we can again communicate as I do beleive he is trying to make this right for all the shareholders. Also, after getting to know George Bentley I would have to say he is a very sincre bright guy who pulls no punches (likes to tell riddles as we all know) but is in this as deep as we all are and wants as much as we all do to make something good happen for all the shareholders. Sorry for the long post today and the stupid post yesterday because not only was it bad for me the share holder but for all of you also. Frank

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next