Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 48.53

+4.4%

10:32 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (1919)	6/25/1996 6:12:00 PM
From: Robert Florin	of 186894

Thanks for the interesting post. As a long time INTC stock holder, now a CYRX stock holder, I am curious about your comment: >>However, Cyrix may have indirectly used some Intel patents (the famous "Crawford Patent" comes to mind) under the grandfather clause from an authorized Intel Licensee. << Do you have some suspicions or know of a specific technical basis for this? Is there something about the Cyrx architecture that requires an Intel patent licensed foundry. I do remember some legal hassling over this issue two years back betweenTXN(?) and someone else. Was it over the Cyrix architecture?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next