Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elroy who wrote (200052)	3/22/2007 2:32:14 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 793800

You'd think they guy could just answer carefully and avoid perjury. A healthy dosage of "I don't remember" on any detailed question should do it. Not possible. Because if one person says "A happened" and another person says "B happened", all it takes is a subjective judgement on the part of a prosecutor to decide that the two people weren't just remembering differently, one of them was deliberately lying. With the failability of human memory, there will always be discrepancies in testimony, substantial ones. Even if nobody lies. Look at the whole Scooter Libbey case. It turned on Libbey saying A, and Tim Russert saying B.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next