SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MikeM54321 who wrote (2001)9/2/1998 3:25:00 PM
From: Geof Hollingsworth  Read Replies (1) of 12823
 
Hi Mike,

A few points, all caveated by my earlier comment about not being an industry expert. I have always understood ATM as a layer 2 switching architecture (well, layers one and two). When you go to layer three switching, you are no longer in the ATM world (the ATM model stops at the user layer), so to me layer 3 ATM chips is a bit of an oxymoron (like political leadership, miltary intelligence, etc. <G>) Once you are in layer 3, you have to "talk" IP, which is a huge jump in complexity and comprehensiveness required of any solutions. The major layer-3 companies that I am familiar with (Avici, Nexabit, Argon, Foundry, Juniper, plus the bigs) are all developing their own silicon (ten chips in the case of Avici)which won't be sold to anyone else. Eventually there may be a market for merchant silicon doing layer-3 switching, but not until the first-generation boxes get installed and the market requirements are sufficiently understood (IMHO).

Like you, I have not heard that Bay makes chips to sell on the merchant market, and it would surprise me greatly. Who would buy them (all likely customers are direct competitors, no?)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext