Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (201125)	9/9/2004 10:26:07 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 1574092

powerlineblog.com indcjournal.com littlegreenfootballs.com Edit - "A Quick Note (Updated) .. tooting my own horn and offering a general rebuttal to my detractors (partisan and otherwise). I just got done getting interviewed by a mainstream media reporter who basically understood the fact that the expert I tracked down is not just an expert, but pretty much the guy that "wrote the book" on this type of thing (typewriter fonts, forgeries, old typewriters). So a couple of things to the rabid folks that are accusing me (and others) of clouding the issue or fabricating a non-story: 1. As I mentioned, Dr. Bouffard is perhaps the most notable expert in this area. Stop raging against the machine - I reported this story honestly and thoroughly. 2. Dr. Bouffard is evidently a Democrat that plans on voting for John Kerry. Sometimes the truth is more important than partisanship, people. I would have reported my findings honestly if the documents had turned out to be real ... And one last bit of shameless blogospheric braggadacio that I'd like to repeat: This reporter told me (and he was referring to Powerline as well) "You did better than Dan Rather, you did better than the Washington Post; just one guy with a computer!" I'd say that goes for LGF and other portions of the blogosphere today. Kudos to everyone that covered an angle and kept it factual. UPDATE: Also, for all of the people bugging me about the fact that Times Roman has been around since the thirties - yes, yes, in printing presses, not as a proportional typewriter font. You guys can come up with theories and comment or e-mail them to me all day long, but experts that do this for a living will be likely be able to tell you why you are wrong. That's why they are called "experts."" indcjournal.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next