Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Coronavirus / COVID-19 Pandemic

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Investor2 who wrote (20113)	1/10/2022 2:16:18 PM
From: denizen48	of 22868

<Here, the Court recognizes the “unduly burdensome” challenges that this FOIA request may present to the FDA. See generally ECF Nos. 23, 30, 34. But, as expressed at the scheduling conference, there may not be a “more important issue at the Food and Drug Administration . . . than the pandemic, the Pfizer vaccine, getting every American vaccinated, [and] making sure that the American public is assured that this was not [] rush[ed] on behalf of the United States . . . .” ECF No. 34 at 46. Accordingly, the Court concludes that this FOIA request is of paramount public importance.> The logic of this conclusion is senseless. <Unduly burdensome > certainly describes the volume of data requested by the plaintiff (who is it?). Is the plaintiff another scientific body? I'm sure it's just another bunch of rt-wing lawyers putting a stick in the spokes of the wheel. tiresome, this neanderthal thinking.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next