View from the Center and Left Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (20140)	6/1/2006 6:31:40 PM
From: TimF	of 541248

I agree, any religious ceremony of marriage shouldn't be the states business (except if its also a legal marriage with a marriage licence). Apparently the law that was upheld is not just dealing with "spiritual marriages" but any "co-habitation". Which seems rather vague to me. Its not clear if it only deals with cases where a marriage is claimed (either a ceremony is held or people just say they are married), or any case where people live together and have sex, or even cases where non-related adults live together without any known sexual relationship. Apparently in this particular case the 2nd "wife" was underage, but he was charged with that fact as a separate offense. No need to bring bigamy/polygamy charges up too IMO. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next