Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (201589)	4/6/2007 6:01:12 PM
From: KLP	of 793671

Hussein Was Not Tied To 9-11, He Was A Risk For Future 9-11s strata-sphere.com Everyone needs get off this obsession that we invaded Iraq because Hussein supposedly had strong ties to 9-11. He was a threat because he had contacts with al Qaeda, applauded their results on 9-11, and was one of the more likely whack-jobs on the planet to go out and fund future 9-11s. That is why he was dangerous. It was not retriution with Hussein, it was trying to safe future risks. Liberals need to prove Hussein would NEVER have provided al Qaeda coverage, training, support or WMDs for FUTURE 9-11s for me to buy their BS. That is why Hussein was deemed a threat - his means and intentions and contacts. He would not allow clear visibility into his weapons AND HIS FUTURE PLANS! Geez, why does the madman Hussien have to be directly tied to 9-11 to be a threat? All he needed was contacts and an interest to build a future alliance with al Qaeda to make them even more successful in killing us. And you know what - he had those in spades. Posted by AJStrata on Friday, April 6th, 2007 at 10:36 am.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next