SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill4/10/2007 7:46:47 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 793885
 
We Wouldn't Want the Islamists to Take Over a Hot Earth [Cliff May]

The BBC just called to ask me to be on a program to debate a report from the Oxford Research Group saying that the US is "increasingly viewed as the greatest threat to world peace" and that the "clear and present danger" is an "increasingly marginalised majority living in an environmentally constrained world, where military force is more likely to be used to control the consequences of these dangerous divisions."

The report adds that since 9/11 "many Western leaders insist that international terrorism is the greatest threat to world security, but the evidence simply does not support this claim. This is distracting us from other much greater threats to security, namely: climate change, competition over resources, marginalisation of the majority world, and global militarisation."

Why do I even bother?

corner.nationalreview.com

tinyurl.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext