Jim, I raised what I felt were relevant issues. You said hype, not me.
Incidentally, your doing it too now, referring to esecurities as "they". Perhaps you can answer me, when you refer to esecurities as
"they", are you referring to Norman Levinson, the creator of this
thread? Or are you referring to some other entity?
I would agree that esecurities has offered information material to
both longs and shorts. I simply asked why the thread was created under
one alias, and then subsequently posted to under another alias. During the early days of this thread it was being posted to under both alias' What I find more troubling is the use of a nebulous "we" when esecurities contributes his insight. It's my opinion that someone
not understanding that esecurities started this thread, or esecurities' use of the collective entity posting style, might interpret the information differently then someone that had all the facts.
Anyway, your points are taken and duly noted. I won't beat this
subject to death. Mr. Levinson's/esecurities non-response were
in their own subtle way, answer enough.
Regards,
shorty |
