SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Investor Clouseau who wrote (202372)9/22/2017 3:03:26 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

   of 224729
 
Paul to Trump in 'Obamacare Lite' Twitter War: 'I Won't be Bribed or Bullied'

WASHINGTON -- In addition to the Twitter war between President Trump and North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, another front has unfolded between Trump and a GOP senator who refuses to vote for the Graham-Cassidy repeal-and-replace bill when it comes to the Senate floor next week.

"Rand Paul, or whoever votes against Hcare Bill, will forever (future political campaigns) be known as 'the Republican who saved ObamaCare,'" Trump tweeted this morning.

"No one is more opposed to Obamacare than I am, and I've voted multiple times for repeal. The current bill isn't repeal," Paul retorted about an hour later. "I won't vote for Obamacare Lite that keeps 90% of the taxes & spending just so some people can claim credit for something that didn't happen."


"Calling a bill that KEEPS most of Obamacare 'repeal' doesn't make it true. That's what the swamp does. I won't be bribed or bullied,"
Paul added.

Paul told CNN on Wednesday that he sees himself as "a very positive force, and actually positively working with the president on different ideas."

"I'm just not with him on Graham/Cassidy because Graham/Cassidy keeps most of the Obamacare spending and it sort of reshuffles it. So instead of Obamacare funding going to California, it gets reshuffled to Republican states. And so I see it really more as sort of petty partisanship," the senator explained. "Hey, let's reshuffle the deck and give the money to the Republican states but let's keep the Obamacare spending. My concern is the debt. We have a $700 billion debt. How are we going to pay for all this?"

"We think the administration is going to, in the next week or two, issue a ruling saying individuals are going to be able to buy across state lines. We think they can do it without a newt bill or legislation from Congress," Paul added. "Here's the thing. My proposal I'm working with on the president will cost zero dollars. The Cassidy/Graham bill is going to spend a trillion dollars. It keeps the Obamacare spending but just reshuffles who gets it. That is not what I promised voters. I promised repeal. I didn't promise I would keep most of it and reshuffle who gets the proceeds."

Paul argued that his plan to allow people to buy insurance across state lines and insurance through trade groups is "offering freedom of choice," while "Cassidy and Graham are offering just a big-government variation of Obamacare that sticks it to the Democrat states and takes the money and gives it to Republican states but really keeps most of the Obamacare spending. And that's not something I'm for."

Paul also argued that House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) isn't correctly whipping votes when he says that the lower chamber could quickly pass Graham-Cassidy without change once the upper chamber sends down the bill.

cont...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext