SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Covered Calls for Dummies Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dan Duchardt who wrote (2003)8/15/2001 3:50:02 PM
From: Dan Duchardt   of 5205
 
Hey Dan... That is too good to be true!!!

Something was bothering me about that last post. Even as I was writing it I had a hard time believing it was as good as it looked. Somewhere in la la land before sleep fell, I realized that a $300 profit after collecting a premium of 1.50 at a strike that is only .65 above the underlying value (total 2.15) just doesn't add up, and that assuming the LEAPS price was going up $10 for a $9.15 rise in the underlying was a real stretch. So what gives?? I used the projected fair value of the LEAPS call in September, but I used the quoted offer for purchase now. The fair value for those LEAPS now is $24.40. So why are they selling at $23.30? No good reason I can think of. They are practically giving them away. Come September, chances are pretty good they will still be discounted, so you will not be able to clear $300 on the trade if called out. $190 to $200 is more like it, at least for closing prices just above the strike. BUT, If GE really did go up that fast to 51, the LEAPS might not be discounted. A run that fast would increase the volatility, and you might actually make the $300. Buying low volatility is always a good thing if you can do it. Selling high volatility has the same advantage.

Dan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext