SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: robert a belfer4/19/2007 7:36:48 PM
   of 793858
 
Studies identify faults in disability benefits system

By Kelly Kennedy - kellykennedy@militarytimes.com


As members of the Veterans’ Disability Benefits Commission wrestle with simplifying the disability benefits systems of the departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs, they have found they aren’t the only ones mystified by the systems’ complexity.

Of the counselors who help former service members through the VA system — which uses the same disability rating schedule as the military — 84 percent said the system isn’t easy to navigate.

And out of 437 raters — the people who make decisions about disability ratings — 99 said the regulations and policies they use are inconsistent.

As veterans and service members complain that the system is unfair and that it does not rate similar injuries equally, 51 percent of counselors told researchers from the Center for Naval Analyses that if several raters from the office rated a service member for post-traumatic stress disorder, it was unlikely that they would all come up with the same rating.

Daniel Harris, an analyst for the center, told the commission March 22 that raters and counselors have the most trouble with cases dealing with mental health disorders, musculoskeletal issues, and sensory organs.

And even as 87 percent of counselors said medical cases are becoming more complex, 80 percent said they felt they were not well-trained.

“It’s not a process that’s easy for the veterans or for the [veterans’ service officers]” who assist them, Harris said. “Making it not only clearer for clients, but ? for raters might be helpful.”

Eric Christensen of the Center for Naval Analyses presented a breakdown of military disability ratings by percentage and service from 2000 to 2006.

The data showed that:

• Airmen are 14 percent more likely than other service members to receive lifetime disability retirement pay rather than one-time severance pay.

• One-fourth of soldiers who go through the system receive a zero percent disability rating even as they are found unfit for duty.

• About 93 percent of all service members get severance payments for ratings of 20 percent or lower rather than the disability benefits that include medical care for the rest of their lives.

• Only 3 percent of Marines going through the system from 2000 to 2006 received disability retirement pay rather than severance pay.

Christensen also said that in a comparison of VA and Defense Department ratings for the same injuries, the VA tended to rate at least 7 percent higher — even though both use the same rating schedules and have the same legal mandates.

For mental health issues, the differences are startling. The military tends to hand out ratings of 10 percent for bipolar disorder, which the VA upped to 38 percent. The military also tends to award 10 percent ratings for major depressive disorder, which the VA upped to 34 percent.

“No one’s going to convince me this system is spotless,” commission member Ken Jordan said. “It won’t hurt this system to have a really good scrub, line by line, piece by piece.”
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext