SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (203484)4/20/2007 1:13:46 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (2) of 793838
 
2) IF, as happened on the VT campus, the school ordered Cho to seek mental health care, and the Judge directed that to happen, then if he was found to be a danger to others, those others should have been notified...(i.e. the school, Cho's roommate, Cho's teachers, etc etc )

Problem was, the Judge found he was a danger to himself and/or others at the initial hearing, but the next day after examination, the psychiatrist determined that he was ok for outpatient treatment/counseling.

In effect, the shrink determined that Cho was not an imminent danger to himself and others and could be released.

What should be the protocol wrt medical records in that instance?

I've been through this with a family member, and I can tell you it is very difficult to to have someone civilly committed. And, once it happens, the whole goal of the medical team is to get the person stabilized and discharged back into the community. Also, there frequently is very little follow-through after discharge.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext