TA-Quotes Plus Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gary Bollenbach who wrote (2032)	9/22/1997 11:52:00 PM
From: Tom Gibbs	of 11149

I'm just making this up, but I think we can assume that the major and most obvious stocks in a group are in both group classifications. And that the differences are in the more fringe or hard to classify stocks. ie. a small company (Simula) makes airplane seats and train seats, and auto safety air bags. They are Aircraft parts?, Railroads?, Auto Parts? Conglomerate? Intel, Microsoft, GM, etc. will easily be in the right catagories. The benefits of the assumption outweight the risks. The oddballs would not have been reliable industry group plays anyway. If an Ind. Grp is up it is most unlikey that the fringe stocks did it. Tom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next