I would say this JF. If a male enjoys sodomy with another male instead of vaginal intercourse with a female, then the male is not acting in a natural way. In other words, there sexual reproductive desires are out of sync with their human instinct to reproduce.
Additionally, if a male only participates in heterosexual sodomy with a female, and doesn't want anything to do with vaginal intercourse, then that person is not acting naturally. And there sexual reproductive desires are out of sync with their instinct to reproduce.
Between these two extremes, lie all kind of gray areas in which humans may enjoy eachother sexually, as long as they include the way we reproduce as a species.
One of the predominant ways AIDS is transferred from one male homosexual to another, is through blood to semen, or blood to blood sodomistic intercourse. I would say, if your body has to bleed in order to obtain sexual pleasure, it is not behaving normally.
Perhaps you can correct me here and describe another activity males participate in which makes us routinely bleed in order to obtain pleasure. Because, I can't think of any.
In regards to your last statement...
"You want to explain this statement",
I thought it was rather obvious. You appear to want to distance yourself from the word "sodomy". Or more specifically "homosodomy". And I simply wondered if it was because the word caused you discomfort. Because in reality, it's a rather precise descriptive word to use.
By the way, the volume of evidence is clear. On a per-person basis, homosexual men are much more likely to be involved in sexual relations with young boys then heterosexual men. Thus, one of the main reasons for the ban on homosexual scout leader is established.
Only a blind PC thinker would believe otherwise. Just stop your PC mind going into defensive mode for a second and think about it JF. |
