International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (20582)	9/11/1997 1:21:00 PM
From: Rock Doctor	of 35569

I agree with Gerald (and others): <<Come on, IPM. Finish something for a change instead of always expanding and never finishing.>> On the Au, they've cut themselves another 2-3 weeks of slack. The question is why ... Whatever the reason, I think it is a Management mis-judgment not to at least say something more than they did about the Au and BD. Silence is usually perceived as a negative, IPM of all companies should be well aware of this now ... The longer this goes, the deeper the hole they dig themselves into and the greater the expectations become. I'm simply going to wait for the "BIG" PR, but when it comes, it better be "BIG", or we'll all be much poorer ... Rock

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next