International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Don Potenza who wrote (20765)	9/13/1997 1:35:00 AM
From: john brefeld	of 35569

To All; I admit I did not read every post since the PR but I don't think anyone has stated what I feel is "in our face" obvious. Bateman was brought on to help with the Pt recovery, right? If my memory serves me correctly wasn't there quite a bit of talk about the co-existance of Pt with Au? In other words, we seem to be taking for granted that the stuff SHOULD be there when in fact it is quite rare for it to be there......no? If this is true, then it would seem very plausible that Bateman's help was for yet another verification of something that is extremely rare in the mining industry and that IPM wants to make very sure of this annoucement. I mean what was the heading of the PR? Expansion of the Pt group........if they announced some pretty high numbers...numbers that would seem UNREAL or FANTASTIC!! wouldn't they have something that the mining (and investment) community just ain't going to believe unless there is a world class firm like Bateman saying so. What do you think? jb

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next