You mean UN, but there is only one sitting at the seat, and all the rest are
negotiating behind and all around them.
Additionally, to keep to the biggest one sitting at the table they have veto-power, to avoid
another really major war, for example, just between two-three of them.
However, they need to take into account that all of the rest might gang up on them, that is,
the situation at the moment.
Ilmarinen
Some say this is what the present is all about, sorting out this USA vs the rest and UN??
But on the other hand Bush II came into UN promising to rejoin UNESCO, so it must
be mainly a question on those chickenhawks left from the pre-WW1 times.
(the ones Kennedy was sure to tape during the Cuba crises on how they answered the repeated
question "and what then"..."and what then"....."and what then"...., some say Chrustev did
the same) |
