SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (20802)6/22/2006 5:24:55 PM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
WMDs in Iraq
By Texas Rainmaker on Uncategorized

There is a lot of buzz about the reports of more WMDs being found in Iraq. I don’t know that this story will be as earth-shattering as some hope. Even if a fully-functional nuclear warhead was discovered with Saddam’s fingerprints and DNA on it next to a picture of Saddam riding the warhead like a circus pony, while holding a sign that says, “America, this nuke’s for you”, the liberalistas would still dismiss it as:

1) fake,
2) planted,
3) having been given to him by Ronald Reagan,
4) a CIA hoax combined with an FBI photoshop and a body double from FEMA.

We know Iraq had WMDs because Saddam used them. And while he may not have had a fully functioning nuclear weapons program the moment we walked in, the Deulfer Report declared that Saddam was simply waiting for the crumbling U.N. sanctions to be lifted to rapidly start up (or restart) the program. And with so-called allies like France, Russia and China trying to help end the sanctions, it was only a matter of time. And given the ties, and mutual hatred of western infidels, between al-Qaida and Baghdad, in a post-9/11 world, it would’ve been negligent to continue down the path of U.N. containment and inspections that were obviously ineffective.

That last point is what makes today’s story newsworthy. Those who oppose our actions in Iraq while claiming the U.N. inspections were “working” are either naive, gullible or just plain stupid. To believe they were working would require you to believe Saddam was an honest and trustworthy man who was actively cooperating with the U.N. and inspectors. The post-2003 invasion discovery of hundreds of chemical weapons, degraded or not, from years past or not, prove that the inspections were not working and that Saddam was actively engaged in deception, hiding such weapons from the inspectors. If he was engaged in deception around old, worn out, potentially unusable weapons, do you think he’d be forthright about active nuclear weapons programs?

If you do, you’re an idiot…

texasrainmaker.com

breitbart.com

texasrainmaker.com

texasrainmaker.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext