SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tom nash who wrote (2106)5/28/1996 12:41:00 AM
From: Jay Chaffin   of 58324
 
Tom,

you came down pretty harsh on Young:

>>This sounds like the B.S. that came over the Oak Technology thread,
with predictions flying like kites. You can see what happened to Oak.
I sometimes wonder if short sellers don't come on and keep building
up interest in a product. I have a large position in IOMG and expect
it to go higher, but such exacting predictions are never met.<<

There are a few people on these threads with uncanny ability to
predict direction and timing of IOMG moves and Young may be one of
them. The others haven't posted here in weeks, but they lurk.

On a separate note, I posted on a SYQT related thread that with 5
million shares in the secondary at >=$40/shr, ~>$200MM will be raised
which would be enough to buy out SYQT. I AM NOT INITIATING A BUYOUT
RUMOR. While it is true that IOMG would have little interest in
Syquest's technology, does Syquest have the manufacturing
capability/capacity to help IOMG rampup to/meet demand?

Jay

LONG on IOMG, no stake in SYQT, not an employee of either
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext