SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (21287)6/16/2006 10:18:23 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) of 541799
 
They're relevant to the Court deciding to hear the case.

No, really, you can't use them. At least lawyers, litigants and judges can't.

The reason should be intuitively obvious. It's to keep people from digging into the record to find a pet "real reason" the justices ruled some way.

The SCOTUS rarely rules narrowly on a narrow set of facts. They don't have the time, unless the case is of paramount importance, see, e.g., Bush v. Gore. They make one-size-fits-all rulings, and the way around them is to parse the words in the opinion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext