SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (21371)8/10/2001 3:13:47 PM
From: Constant Reader   of 82486
 
There are standard forms readily available - most libraries probably have "how-to" books and samples. One does not need an attorney to create any of those documents. A good attorney could draft a tighter, more individualized, document, but most use boilerplates.

As I said, any couple can have problems with blood relatives interfering with their decisions. That said, rare indeed would be the judge (local or state) who would ignore overwhelming documentation of the patient's preference. Granting someone medical and/or general power of attorney, as well as trusteeship in the event of incapacity, is pretty convincing. Many couples (straight and gay) specifically exclude their blood relatives' interference, some spelling out in great detail the reasons for the exclusion. This is not so much an access problem as one caused by lack of information, misinformation, and a widespread belief that "it can't happen to me/us."

Almost all of the presumed security offered by state recognition to a legally married couple can be obtained elsewhere by unmarried couples. Employer-provided family health care has been an important exception, but is becoming less important as more and more companies, and government entities, grant partners benefits.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext