SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 221.06-1.1%Jan 5 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: misen who wrote (219190)12/5/2006 11:57:24 PM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Misen,

Nice to see someone talks my language:)

You may argue with the assumptions above, but the assumptions are close enough to reality that the example represents real behavior.

Yes it does. Let us remember that these are models and their usefulness is in predicting yield. Based on the assumptions you've listed, if you know the defect density for a process based on a current product or other process monitor, you can use the poisson or murphy's model to predict the yield on another new product for which you have no data. If your process is defect limited as you stated, then it does an excellent job of predicting yield on a die of any size. That's why we can say that if we know the defect density and Company X has a fab capacity of Y wafers and a die size of Z, then they should be able to produce n Good die per unit period of time.

Question for you. What do you consider world class defect density? I have been saying it's .25/cm2. What is your opinion?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext