SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board
ZEN.V 0.940-6.0%Dec 29 3:58 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bigfind who wrote (219)9/30/2015 2:31:57 PM
From: stuffbugRead Replies (1) of 12350
 
bigfind, a couple of thoughts.

1. For all the zennanites, the final paragraph is the key.
Canada Carbon Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Mr. R. Bruce Duncan stated, "This is part of the ongoing process of academic review of our Miller graphite and we are gratified that our graphite has been proposed to become the first ever ASTM Standard Reference Material for natural nuclear graphite. We look forward to receipt of the final characterization results and certification documentation. If the Miller hydrothermal lump/vein thermally upgraded graphite obtains ASTM SRM designation, our graphite will become the standard to which all other natural graphites are compared, when considered for nuclear and other high-technology applications."
Albany graphite is still undergoing initial testing for suitability in three market segments.
The Miller graphite is on the verge of becoming "the standard to which all other natural graphites are compared, when considered for nuclear and other high-technology applications."
If CCB obtains final certification, it should put an end to the debate of one of a kind, unique deposit versus the best, the standard - at least until the specifications for purified Albany graphite ever match those of the Miller graphite.

2. In the June meeting, Miller graphite was selected for further testing. I suspect that samples were sent to the international laboratories during July and August. If so, CCB may already have received some preliminary results. Hopefully this is the case and the results are as expected. Generally speaking, a company only makes this sort of announcement when it is fairly confident that it will eventually receive accreditation.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext