Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 48.23

+2.3%

Feb 11 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: greenspirit who wrote (22285)	5/18/1997 8:12:00 AM
From: Fred Fahmy	of 186894

Michael, One of the best, most factual posts I have read in a long time. It *was* Intel who had vision and took risk. IBM had no vision. If they would have had vision, all that INTC and MSFT enjoy today would be their's. The anti-Intel mongers act as if Intel just lucked into their good fortune. Oh well, there will always be those who are envious and jealous of other people's success. BTW, if Apple and DEC controlled things we would all be paying $5000-$10000 for PC's instead of $1000-$3500. <Intel has a virtual monopoly on microprossesors for one reason and one reason only. Execution of a business plan, and Vision with a capital "V".> And they have been able to maintain this status, in part, because AMD and Cyrix while having decent products have had terribe marketing, no focus, and zero leadership (i.e. weak management). AMD and Cyrix would do much better if they understood that they are competing against each other not against Intel. FF

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next