Shiloh,
This is where I run into a sticking point in the article you posted:
<<<Instead of acquiescing to the hard-sell tactics of the Bush administration, the Taliban unleashed Osama bin Laden upon America. They were going to lose everything, and chose
to attack first in the hope that all-out war would break out in Central Asia and rally other Muslim nations to their cause.... The families of those slain on 9/11 have not taken all of this lying down. They have sued the government of Saudi Arabia for civil damages totaling $1 trillion, accusing them of harboring and aiding the terrorists who took down the Towers. There is profound merit to their claim, as 15 of the 19 terrorists who flew the planes on 9/11 came from Saudi Arabia, as does Osama bin Laden and the Wahabbi sect of Islam that motivates their jihad.>>>
In no uncertain terms, Pitt accuses bin Laden of being responsible for the attacks, the Taliban sent him, and 15 of the terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. There is no evidence of any kind to support those claims, and if there were, there would be no need for an investigation.
In my book that makes Pitt a liar and a con man of the lowest sort. The type of "investigation" Pitt proposes would result in a few scapegoats, while ignoring the core issue that a year and a half after the fact, the perpetrators have yet to be identified, when all available information points to a black op put together between the Bush Cartel and the Israeli Mossad. |
