Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Road Walker who wrote (223441)	3/11/2005 1:22:11 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) of 1573092

>>> Are our current actions increasing or decreasing the chances we'll be attacked again? Increasing. Can you provide any evidence that this statement is correct? >>> Why were we attacked on 9/11? Was it because we "let the world live their lives as they please"? No. Was it because we didn't? No. >>> And why is bin Laden, the ONLY one who attacked us, twice, still at large? It is unfortunate. But the answer is that Clinton did not act on it when he had the chance. He had multiple opportunities to capture bin Laden and either failed or refused to do so. There is little doubt that Bush will seize any opportunity to do so.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next