SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: elmatador4/1/2019 3:18:44 AM
  Read Replies (3) of 13781
 
My interest on the subject of energy and electric cars is:
How the landscape looks like after a big % of the cars are electric?

Need to have an understanding on how the industry develops.

. Which brings me to California.

Ok this is 2016

Fully 45.3 percent of the country's more than 400,000 plug-in cars were sold in California, according to data from the state's Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative.


Should Utility Customers Pay For Electric-Car Charging Stations They Don't Use?


JOHN VOELCKER FEBRUARY 5, 2016 124 COMMENTS

California is by far the most advanced state in adopting plug-in electric cars.

Fully 45.3 percent of the country's more than 400,000 plug-in cars were sold in California, according to data from the state's Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative.

But electric cars need public charging stations, which raises the question of how they're paid for.

Now some of California's largest electric utilities have submitted plans to install large networks of charging stations--paid for, in most cases, by their customers.

As an editorial in the Los Angeles Times last week notes, "the state's largest electric utilities are scrambling to get charging stations built over the next few years at workplaces, apartment buildings, shopping centers and other gathering spots."

It's widely accepted that public 240-Volt Level 2 charging stations are not likely to recapture the cost of their installation, maintenance, and electricity use through fees paid by drivers who use them to recharge.


Nissan unveils New Orleans' first public charging station for electric cars (photo: Richard Read)

And it remains an open question whether even DC fast-charging stations, which can recharge a battery to 80 percent of capacity in roughly 30 minutes, can pay for themselves.

If a state like California has a mandate to boost zero-emission vehicles to a majority of the cars on its roads by 2050, and charging stations are a necessary piece of the puzzle, then who should pay?

Electric-car maker Tesla Motors has funded its Supercharger DC quick-charging system itself, but it's limited to drivers of Tesla cars at the moment.

Nissan, BMW, and Volkswagen are funding smaller networks of both Level 2 and DC quick-charging stations in limited corridors in a few regions of the U.S.

But other carmakers--notably General Motors, despite its upcoming Chevrolet Bolt EV--do not have publicized plans to contribute to charging stations, either locally or nationally.

And the Federal funding that contributed to the first few thousand charging stations starting in 2010 is now used up, and it's not likely to come back.


Which brings us to California's electric utilities.

Two large utilities, Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas & Electric, propose to install large networks of charging stations that they would own.

And the tariffs they have submitted would require their ratepayers to cover the entire construction cost.

The Los Angeles Department of Water & Power and Southern California Edison, on the other hand, offers rebates to spur private construction of charging stations owned by others.

While its ratepayers cover the costs of that program, the ultimate owners of those stations pay for installation and operation.

The Los Angeles Times editorial comes down firmly on the side of this second model, which it notes is supported by the state's Office of Ratepayer Advocates too.

"This is not good for ratepayers, and it's even worse for competition," the paper writes. "After all, who else could construct charging stations with someone else's money?"

It goes on to suggest an alternative model:

It would be better if regulators used as a model the $22 million pilot program they approved for Edison this month to subsidize 1,500 privately owned charging stations over the next two years.

Edison will offer rebates of 25 percent to 100 percent of a station's cost, with the full rebate available only for stations built in low-income communities....


That's a fairly modest incentive, and the [Public Utilities Commission] plans to review the program's effectiveness before letting Edison expand it.


EVgo DC fast-charging site in Fremont, California

Despite public hearings and comments, the politics of utility regulation are frequently impenetrable and arcane.

But we're likely to see many more such debates over coming years, as utilities both work to increase their electricity sales and become a last fallback for large-scale charger installation

_______________________________________

Follow GreenCarReports on Facebook and Twitter.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext