Jonathan, do you think they (sone et al) can explain in detail and concisely what EACH xstream is and which one is traded publicly and which one is held by whom and which one is which and which one is privately held? and which subsidiary is owned by XSNI? and what are all the relationships? and why are they all named so similarly - intentionally confusing or just an oversight? Cuz it sure is confusing with all those same names but for the UK, Technologies, an INC. thrown in here and there.
No wonder no one knows what anything is. Nothing to get lawyers after anyone for I would think, since no one has been right about anything so far.
But I am just stupid and Jacassalyn - I had a great laugh over that Jonathan, and gave you great credit - lived 45 years and have been treated like crap by the best and never had anyone come up with that name. My Dad would have given you money for that one when I was about 15 years old; he wised up after I left the homestead - never know what you got til its gone.
Anyway, missed you the past few days; we have to think of a role for you in this movie bit - could be Peter Sellers Pink Panther, certainly not a Liam Neeson type - always have something informative to post AFTER someone comes up with alternative public documents. Da Da, Da Dum, Da Da, Da Dum What do you think? Everyone asking for thoughts today.
C U, Demi Moore :)
edit: I do admit though Jonathan, you are just as in the dark as the rest of us over here; with all the documents you have in front of you and what you have been holding for over the past few years, man, has the company always conducted themselves with such secrecy and convoluted documents? Good luck |
