Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (22554)	12/10/2004 12:12:00 AM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (1) of 90947

I guess the question is, what should be counted? Should ballots that were not counted on Rounds 1 and 2 be counted during Round 3? I think not. There has to be finality. The definition of recount, from Dictionary.com, is "To count again." This implies that the things being counted were counted before. Ballots rejected for whatever reason during round 1 were not counted, and should not be counted again. That, dear cetacean, is my rather simplistic view of this. If Gregoire wins by this recount, I will be supporting a recall.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next