SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went!
INSP 98.00+3.1%3:35 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TH who wrote (22757)12/12/2000 12:16:14 PM
From: Puck  Read Replies (2) of 28311
 
For anyone interested in learning more about what motivates analysts like Blodget in their public stock recommendations and how perverted their industry is, I would highly recommend reading this Washington Post article, which is a day in the life of Henry Blodget, published last April, and cited in the Motley Fool article Thurston Howell has aired again:

washingtonpost.com

Since ML recently downgraded INSP, I thought it would be useful to place their downgrade in a little perspective. According to the Washington Post article, ML/Blodget downgraded Inktomi about a year ago, and it subsequently doubled in price within a month:

It's a difference the market frequently misses. Last Oct. 22, Blodget downgraded the Internet infrastructure company Inktomi from an intermediate term "accumulate" to "neutral." (He kept his long-term "buy" rating.) It was the Ax in action: Inktomi immediately fell 15 percent. But within a month, it had nearly doubled.

"We were wrong on Inktomi," he says now. "It's very painful to be wrong, to say 'sell' and it goes up. It causes a lot of animosity with the company, with shareholders, and you weren't even right."


These guys certainly aren't infallible in their opinions (or even mostly right).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext