Interpreting a photograph Betsy's Page
Richard B. Woodward has such an interesting tale of a photograph from 9/11. German photographer Thomas Hoepker captured a picture of five young people across the river from the smoke coming up from the World Trade Center. Click here to see the photograph and see what you think of it,

opinionjournal.com
then read Woodward's story of how the photographer five years letter and Frank Rich decided to put their own interpretation on what the photo showed and use it to demonstrate that Americans were fated to "move on" quickly from the trauma of that day. Frank Rich wrote,
<<< "from the perspective of 9/11's fifth anniversary, Mr. Hoepker's photo is prescient as well as important--a snapshot of history soon to come. What he caught was this: Traumatic as the attack on America was, 9/11 would recede quickly for many. This is a country that likes to move on, and fast. The young people in Mr. Hoepker's photo aren't necessarily callous. They're just American." >>>
Woodward's point is very well-taken. You don't need photographers photoshopping phony bomb damage or inserting stuffed animals to change how we view an event. You can have photographers just misusing a photo to fit their own interpretation of events. And, in so doing, they tell us more about themselves than about the event they're trying to portray.
As Woodward writes,
<<< Mr. Hoepker suppressed his photograph of the "blasé" New Yorkers for four years because, he said, it did not express the rage and suffering that he and millions felt that day. The image didn't fit the accepted narrative of the event. As Mr. Friend writes in his book, "it did not meet any of our standard expectations of what a September 11th photograph should look like."
With the passage of time, however, Mr. Hoepker has gone back and re-evaluated the image. Last year he was proud enough to choose it as the catalog cover for his retrospective in Munich. He now compares it to Breughel's "Landscape With the Fall of Icarus," the painting in which most of the 16th- century figures seem unaware or unconcerned by the body of the Greek boy plummeting from the sky into the sea.
Having reassessed the image in light of all the other less ambiguous pictures published from that day, he believes it "has grown in importance." In effect, he has Photoshopped it in his mind so that it now belongs neatly in a more contemporary storyline of this nation's culpability for world unease. The German press has reproduced the photograph widely and seems to have read it, as Mr. Rich did, to upbraid Americans for their hedonism and short memories. Funny, but I don't know many New Yorkers who have moved past 9/11, certainly none who has done so "fast." Thomas Hoepker may be the exception. >>>
betsyspage.blogspot.com
opinionjournal.com |