SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (230828)4/27/2005 2:40:50 PM
From: tejek   of 1574127
 
No, it's the "religious party" that is threatening to change the rules wrt filibusters; the nuclear option."

The infuriating thing is they have been lying about their role in psst filibusters, pretending that this is a new, and unconstitutional phenomena. It's not that they are doing it, they are politicians after all, but our so-called journalists let them get away with it. Heck, the other day I was listening to NPR and heard John Cornyn, our very own entry in the dull knife drawer, state in essence that judicial nominations have never been filibustered before.

Amazing........the filibuster has been around for 200 years.

And we needed to do something before a Supreme Court nominee got filibustered, totally shredding the Constitution in the process. I don't know, the Republicans filibustered a Supreme Court nominee in 1968 and the Constitution seems to have survived that crisis. I know, I know, it was different then since it was a Republican filibuster and they did it with the greatest respect of the Constitution...

That's because the GOP filibusters 'constitutionally'. The Dems just filibuster. I am sorry you don't see the difference.

It is amusing to note that the Republicans are pretending that the Democrats are the only ones using the phrase "nuclear option". Given that a Republican coined the term and that they have been using the phrase consistently until recently makes it seem strange. I guess this is like the term "privatization" in conjunction with Social Security. They just have so much trouble getting the terminology right.

I think they continue to overplay their hand. I was real happy when Bush came out in support of Delay.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News