Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jackjc who wrote (23067)	10/19/2006 3:14:40 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) of 78417

cuu.v/mmgg - for sure, cuu is more iffy in the short run, that's partly why i hold them in about one-to-three ratio ... long run though it seems inevitable that Schaft Creek will be mined, there's not all that much copper on the planet and it's vital to modern life ... things could go wrong in the meantime - if Cu prices crashed, or if major enviro objections were raised, cuu could have a hard time financing enough to complete their option ... but you pays yer nickel and takes yer chances, there's a big upside as reward if/when things go even half-right On infrastructure - old Wackie Bennett would have run a railroad and power line in there and said alright boys, mine er now ... the son too, spent megabucks on Tumbler Ridge just prior to twenty years of extremely low coal prices, what the taxpayers got was mostly a big hole in the ground, so they're a bit more leery now, lol .... every factor in the whole equation is always subject to change, except those billions of tonnes of half of one per cent copper are pretty much fixed in stone

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next