SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Computer Learning

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: heidi s who wrote (23216)11/5/2001 11:01:15 AM
From: Zardoz  Read Replies (1) of 110652
 
I was told by a friend that for my intended use, the amount of memory in a new machine is more important than processor speed.

Actually processor speed and avaliable bandwidth {cable or ADSL} are more important. IF you are using some form of Java quote server, then Ram amount does become an issue. I can get stock quotes on my old 486, as well as on my 3 Athlon boards. Well over 2000 stocks, but effectively every stock quote is possible {But I seldom use more then 50}

RDram is Rambus DRam and can only be used on a board that supports it {usually P4's}
DDR Ram is (Double Data Rate) SDRAM {which is just a nicer form of CAS {Column Access Strobe} & RAS strobing
Sdram is esecially a single CAS step {with compressed RAS strobing}

You must decide if you motherboard can support the Ram, or decide if you really want a motherboard that uses such Ram. The performance over RDram and DDR is moot. SDram is only slightly weaker then DDR. BUT I'd suggest you only use a DDR board. Also there are different speed asociated with each RAM type. The best design for a computer is really an Athlon 1.4+Ghz FSB 266 with 266 DDR ram... Still kicks P4's. And easily to over clock.

Zardoz
PS: I also run Seti@home on all machines {except the 486... which I can't get anyone to take of my hands for free}
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext