SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (22430)10/19/2006 7:04:29 PM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
    Not voting due to polls may be the surest way to lose.

A Real Perspective On Polling

Riehl World View

Two days before the 2002 mid-term elections, Zogby vs the result.

Mondale was cruising by 5 in Minnesota

Minnesota

Mondale 50
Colman 45

Too bad he lost by 3 points.

Mondale 47
Colman 50


Strickland was a lock by 9 in Colorado

Colorado

Strickland 53
Allard 44

Just two days and a 16 point swing later he lost by 5.

Strickland 46
Allard 51


Max Cleland, what can I say? Result in bold. Are you noticing a pattern here?

                   Georgia
          Zogby                 Actual
Cleland 49 46
Chamblis 49 53


My, my .. the beat goes on.

                   Texas
          Zogby                 Actual
Kirk 48 43.3
Coryn 49 55.3


Many are familiar with Thune, who didn't lose by the 5 Zogby projected. How many people stayed home on the margin? Your guess.

                South Dakota
          Zogby                 Actual
Johnson 52 49.6
Thune 47 49.5


Zogby had Lautenberg right in NJ, but under-polled Forester by 6 points.

                   New Jersey
            Zogby                 Actual
Lautenburg 54 54
Forester 38 44


Carnahan by 1 but 2 more popped up for Talent and he won. The typos are via Kos.

                  Missouri
          Zogby                 Actual
Carnhan 49 49
Tallent 48 50


And going back to Oct. 22, these pearls of wisdom from DailyKos via Charlie Cook:

<<< Cook notes that Dems have a good shot at taking GOP seats in Arkansas, New Hampshire and Colorado, while the race in North Carolina has become unexpectedly competitive... Consider, perhaps the surest takeover bet is Arkansas, a GOP seat. And if the GOP loses New Hampshire, which I believe is likely, then forget it. There's no way the GOP can take the Senate. >>>


Too bad Dems lost all of the above by 5 - 10 points.

MSNBC says Big Dem Wins Likely (link below). Now where have I seen that before?

Not voting due to polls may be the surest way to lose.

Update: The Dems are certainly working to pump up their liberal base. If the Republicans don't, conservatives, among others, will lose.

riehlworldview.com

dailykos.net

fec.gov

dailykos.net

fec.gov

msnbc.msn.com

stoptheaclu.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext