SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rocket Red who wrote (233728)10/20/2025 2:38:23 PM
From: VisionsOfSugarplums1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longz

  Read Replies (1) of 233780
 
Was thinking it wouldn't necessarily be overturned, but would entail a transition from the crown to First Nations, all else stays the same, still fee simple ownership. If not, then would think there's a right for property owners as individuals to sue the crown, since the crown would have granted a fee simple to property owners that they effectively weren't entitled to grant.

In the meanwhile, if they fear monger, property values drop, people panic sell, predatory capital comes in and picks it up on the cheap. And then later, all they find out is that First Nations replaces the crown and nothing else changes.

Don't know how this plays out...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News