Welcome to Slider's Dugout Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: longjonsilvers who wrote (2345)	9/13/2006 3:39:07 PM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (1) of 50729

*** PLEASE! Go to this link NOW *** I guarantee you that this will be the most sobering, informative and compelling 90 minutes that you've spent in quite some time. Here's the link: video.google.com The above statement is with credit to conspiracy theorist SOB. As he always says: "Play the player, not the cards". It seems that oh great benevolent SOB, has been had by the 22 year old producer of loose change Here's Slider's post: Message 22267762 Really go to this link: video.google.com It's 3 hours of reality tv to conspiracy folks. 1. Building 7 was badly damaged by the collapsing WTC and fire, in this you'll see the damage prior to it's collapse. You didn't see the damage in loose change. Why not? You'll see demonstration as to why it wasn't controlled demolition. You'll actually see a controlled demolition and see that what happened with the 3 buildings is not the same. 2.For the answer to #2, go find the Discovery documentary "What Brought Down The World Trade Center". Or buy the book "Debunking the Myth of 9/11" 3. There are not fighters on the ground ready to go in minutes. You've been duped again by a 22 year old kid. The link above spells it out what was available. It also corrects every other scam this kid has perpetrated on you guys. Besides, how much time was there? Not as much as you think. Heck, they at some point had over 6 possible hijackings, which do they go after? By the time a jet was confirmed as positively hijack. It was too late. >>any problems that are found in the 911 truth movements theories are small compared to the establishment's problems in answering the above questions. << It does???? You have to ignore a lot of evidence to get to this conclusion. You'll see and hear how the producer of loose change distorts actual interviews. Why did they have to do that? Tell me your above statement after you've watched the complete correction to "loose change" version

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next