Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neeka who wrote (23460)	1/8/2004 7:38:38 PM
From: Lane3	of 793938

I think it was a move designed to collect more tax revenue. I think it's main thrust was to allow businesses to legitimize their hiring. The reason I think that is that business is the only clear winner in this proposal. I'd been wondering what happened to the last law, the last amnesty, which included a prohibition on hiring illegals. That clause seems to have fallen by the wayside. It doesn't seem to have been enforced. At least we've had no reports of that. The Walmart thing was an example. Did they take any action against the employer? Haven't heard of any.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next