THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 689.17

+0.2%

Dec 11 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (23671)	10/10/2008 5:40:22 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) of 25737

Your rhetorical question is really too vague to answer properly. For example: "asked him questions critical to the performance of the job" (Like WHAT? What 'questions'?) Naturally, as with any rhetorical question, the question is not really intended to have any answer.... but, if you are asking me if I would CHOOSE to hire someone who did not strike me the right way in the interview, then obviously I would say 'no'. Of COURSE --- with regard to the American Presidency, the American people remain TOTALLY FREE to use any criteria that they WANT TO in arriving at their personal decision as to who to vote for, and who to not vote for. Which is exactly fine by me! And, I think, how our founders wanted it to be. (Now, are you going to propose that our Constitution be altered... and some new and different requirements be inserted for qualifying to run for the Presidency?) Because if you are not... you STILL have EXACTLY AS MUCH PERSONAL LIBERTY to make your own mind up as to whom you want to vote for as ANY OTHER CITIZEN OF THIS GREAT LAND. (I'm happy with that....)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next