Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Amit Ghate who wrote (2365)	6/21/1999 1:07:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier	of 4504

<<1. Drill hole TG-1 intercept over interval 26.0 to 30.9 meters should read true width 4.9 m at 150.7 g/t Ag, not 12.0 m true width. This correction may slightly affect the average grade calculated for the deposit. >> Good observation Amit... But i think that the error does not affect the total width and garde of the hole... it is only a typo on the true width of the last section manhattan-min.com <<2. I don't understand how the average of TG-11 can be 628.9 g/t over 13.8 m, when 10.7 m of that interval show an average around 25 g/t. Are there nuggets in the samples? If so how will that affect continuity calculations? >> Good catch again... either the 628g/t is a typo or the section below and above the 5.6m has it a rich pocket in the 1300g/t Ag... which is a possibility. I'll try to find an answer. << How did these assays compare to the BRGM assays with respect to Ag values (which I believe are the only overlapping elements in the assays)? >> IMO, these are not overlapping elements. My understading is that the overlying oxidized cap was not assayed by BGRM... so the silver in there is new silver. Remember that in 1979-80, there was no such thing as heap leaching... companies where simply not looking for this stuff..they were after the sulfides. But again, I could be wrong... will check as well. In any case, the silver grades on the sulfide body are 38g/t ton.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next