I posted the dat abacause I made a mistake on my earlier post and was correcting it and apologizing to the thread for the bad info. I did not have to do this, but out of respect and the fact that I am straight up when I am these threads turned into me posting the correction. Yes, the stock is probably long goe on the previous run, but that was not the point of my post. To try and understand the structure of the stock only empowers you to make better decisions. As far as Tim Luke, I have over a year ago had some run ins with him. We have not traded posts until this thread and I have not posted or followed his posts since we were on this thread. I don't know him, but I do not dislike him. He appears to be an allright guy. Everyone has a personality and Tim gets right to the point like him or hate him, he really didn't come on the thread and be an as#####. He stoked the flames a bit, but so what? There was a comment by someone earlier "it's only a stock" and sometimes we all need to be reminded of that. He is not a bad guy, give him a chance, you might be pleased.
If someone else brought the info I gave to the thread tonight, most people here would be thanking them for sharing that type of information. I bring it, and red flags go up. So, it appears that my posts are always disadvantaged from the start, even if it is good data. I have from day one maintained that the deal is in where the stock is, not the business model. You may not agree with me, but thats what makes a market. I said over a year ago that until the form 10 is filed, I would not invest because I wanted to know where the stock is, and why and who it is with. The picture has become much clearer now. I have said in recent posts that I think the company has a good shot. Yet I am questioned again as to my motives. This company will make it or fail regardless of what is posted on this thread. If people don't like me here, tough, you just have to live with it.
Good trading to you, ICE |
