SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Philip Morris - A Stock For Wealth Or Poverty (MO)
MO 58.19+0.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ralph Bergmann who wrote (2396)9/24/1998 4:23:00 PM
From: Geoff   of 6439
 
From Merrill Lynch, response to "September 23, 1998 WSJ Article on Price Discounting":

We doubt that the weakness in tobacco stocks reflects any concern about a rise in price discounting. Philip Morris shares touched their historic high the previous day as the odds for a tobacco settlement by the remaining 46 states appears more imminent. The small decline we saw yesterday appears to be more a correction from the rise we have seen in recent days rather than a reaction to what could be considered an adverse article.

The settlement appears to be moving closer to fruition. From what we understand, the nine attorneys general who are negotiating are conferring with the remaining states to see how many would be willing to come on board with the terms they have agreed upon.

Price discounting has undoubtedly accelerated as the likelihood of a settlement grows closer, as the industry will not likely be able to advertise and promote as aggressively under the terms of the settlement.

There is some concern that the current high level of price promotions will hurt profit margins. This has not been the case thus far. Profits per pack continue to show good growth, as has been the case since the trough in April 1993 after Philip Morris cut prices on Marlboro.


And Ralph, I stick to my gut instinct that there will be some mechanism that will coordinate the tobacco tax so that no state gets a benefit through a lower tax of some sort. The tax increase should provide stable earnings, however, if the price is too high, demand will erode. We really need to wait and see what the settlement looks like. As for a new McCain bill, I can't imagine something like that gaining momentum if the states are settled. The Congress would be able to simply shrug off the duty of coming up with a comprehensive bill. Instead, I expect HUGE challenges from the advertising and marketing industry, as well as from the convenience stores, that challenge any settlement that restricts marketing too much as unconstitutional. We will see, there will always be excitement in the tobacco wars, but the settlement will act as a cease-fire of sorts for the intermediate term as tobacco regroups for the next major battle, IMVHO.

Best of luck, and I remain long MO,

geoff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext