| Global warming on trial 
 Sixth-graders decide that humans aren’t to blame
 
 By Ben Ready
 The Daily Times-Call
 
 LONGMONT  — Humans don’t cause global warming, a jury of sixth graders at Trail  Ridge Middle School concluded Thursday after hearing opposing arguments  from their peers.
 
 “They’re pretty young for this kind of  thinking. They did great,” paleontology teacher Ken Poppe said after the  40-minute “trial” in his classroom.
 
 With Earth’s warming accepted as a tenet, pre-teen “lawyers” and “scientists” debated whether humans have caused it.
 
 Eleven  jurors listened intently as prosecutors and defendants flashed  contradictory graphs tracking global temperatures, carbon dioxide  levels, polar ice cap statistics, volcanic activity and sea surface  temperatures — all of which were found Wednesday in the school’s  computer lab.
 
 “The earth has warmed and cooled over many  years. If it’s caused by CO2, why haven’t the charts shot up?” Poppe’s  son and lead prosecutor Caleb argued during a rebuttal.
 
 In a  climax that sent half the class to its feet and forced the judge to call  for order, opponent Monique Nem slapped a contradictory graph onto the  prosecution’s table.
 
 “We’ve proven you wrong! The CO2 levels have shot up,” she said.
 
 The  jury responded more warmly, however, to Caleb Poppe’s response: The  graphic cited a Hawaiian source; Hawaii has volcanoes; volcanoes emit  CO2.
 
 In closing arguments, Alexia Hegy said global temperatures  actually decreased in the 1960’s, while the global population rose.
 
 Humans cannot be at fault, she concluded.
 
 With the  final word, defense attorney Sarah Steed countered: “It all comes back  to us, the people — not the sun, not the weather. We need to turn off  lights when we don’t need them. Bikes can work. The environment can be  richer.”
 
 Seven of 11 jurors decided humans are not to blame, but everyone agreed classroom debates make for fun learning.
 
 “It was a hard decision, because both sides made good points,” said student Samantha Roberts.
 
 Ken  Poppe said he let students choose which side of the debate to argue.  Poppe personally believes global warming is cyclical and not affected by  humans, while his Colorado State University student aide David Richards  believes the opposite. Both, however, said they presented both sides  equally to the students leading up to Thursday’s debate.
 
 “What I think is not the issue. It’s what the students dig up and how they present the case,” Poppe said.
 
 Only  one parent questioned Poppe’s decision to hold a global warming debate.  That mother expected him to present Al Gore’s global warming movie “An  Inconvenient Truth” as indisputable facts, Poppe said. After he  explained his neutrality in the classroom, the mom allowed her child to  participate in the debate, he said.
 
 “You don’t understand  someone’s position until you can argue it to their satisfaction,” Poppe  said, quoting a famous physicist. “I don’t believe in Darwinism either,  but I can argue it as well as any Darwinist.”
 |