Personally, even if I was able to put other Members on "Ignore" (which, by the way, I'm NOT able to do), I wouldn't.
I prefer to read what anyone has to say, and, if necessary or if required to do so, I will respond accordingly.
I believe I have made very few references to Dale Baker on this Board. I would be more than willing to repeat them on his own Thread, but needless to say I cannot do so.
I don't believe I resorted to derogatory remarks about him in this particular thread. I just questioned a strategy that incorporated a very large portfolio of stocks, some of which, by his own admission, were impacting negatively on his portfolio.
I would have thought that it would surely be better to be able to choose, analyse and hold one's stocks in such a way that one took maximum advantage of those better QUALITY stocks, whose Fundamentals indicated that they were currently making ongoing profits and providing value for their shareholders.
Dale is very much a proponent of doing one's OWN company analysis based on Fundamental principles. In that regard I'm with him all the way.
IMHO, it's just a question of how one implements that principle.
... And how my posts come across to you is surely your own personal opinion, to which you’re entitled, as I’m entitled to mine. |
